Trump demanding that Apple must unlock shooter's iPhones because of foreign apps
by William Gallagher · AppleInsiderRepublican Presidential candidate Trump has called for Apple to help the FBI unlock iPhones and "foreign apps" belonging to people accused of plotting to assassinate him.
As predicted by AppleInsider back in July 2024, former President Trump has weighed in on the long-standing disagreement between Apple and the FBI. Repeatedly, the FBI will call for backdoors to be added to iOS to allow law enforcement access, and Apple will point out that this makes a back door for bad actors too.
Now according to Fortune magazine, Republican presidential nominee Trump has said that Apple has to help the FBI. Trump said that the FBI had been unable to unlock "three potentially foreign-based apps" on the iPhone belonging to Thomas Matthew Crooks, who was behind the shooting in Pennsylvania.
The fact that it is specifically three "foreign-based apps" that the FBI can't access, suggests that the agency has otherwise unlocked the iPhone. Conceivably, the apps store data in their own servers instead of iCloud and this is why the FBI can't get further.
Apple has previously handed over information stored in its iCloud servers to authorities. Based on existing statements made by the FBI and the Secret Service, this appears to have already happened.
But, if an app's developer stores the user's data on an external server, Apple physically cannot access it nor does it have the access to go get it.
Trump also said that the reportedly would-be assassin Ryan Wesley Routh had six cellphones. These are presumably but not definitely iPhones, which the FBI had "likewise been unable to penetrate."
"They [the FBI] must get Apple to open the foreign apps," said Trump at a rally in North Carolina, "and they must get Apple to likewise open the six phones from the second lunatic."
The speech also follows the presidential nominee being briefed by US intelligence services over a report that Iran was attempting to have him assassinated. There is no connection that has been made public between Iran and the previous incidents.
"If I were the president,' he continued, "I would inform the threatening country, in this case, Iran, that if you do anything to harm this person, we are going to blow your largest cities and the country itself to smithereens."
Apple's refusal to open up the iPhone to law enforcement was chiefly first highlighted when the firm denied a request over the Pensacola shooters in 2020. Since then, Apple has continually defended what it says is its users' right to privacy, and the FBI has carried on attempting to hack into iPhones anyway.
20 Comments
DAalseth 2963 comments · 6 Years
About 22 hours ago
Trump doesn’t understand what end-to-end-encryption means.
But then there are a lot of things he doesn’t understand
JamesCude 63 comments · 3 Years
About 22 hours ago
Sorry gramps doesn’t work like that.
sflagel 843 comments · 11 Years
About 21 hours ago
In my mind, an analogy is a house versus a safe deposit box or a vault.
Parts of the iPhone and its data (iCloud) are like a house, but within that house, there may be a safe within which documents cannot be accessed. The house can be accessed with the appropriate warrant; but that does not mean that law-enforcement has access to the safe.
Are banks and manufacturers of safes boxes required to provide a master key for the safe deposit box to law-enforcement if asked? If that is the case, then the same should apply to virtual safety deposit boxes. If they are not required to provide master keys, then neither should technology providers.
DaRev 29 comments · 5 Years
About 21 hours ago
Routh is alive and should be compelled to unlock the apps in question or face additional penalties. As for TMC's phone and Apps. unless they are written down Trump and the FBI are SOL.
hammeroftruth 1347 comments · 16 Years
About 21 hours ago
Apple's refusal to unlock the phones from the San Bernardino attack in 2015 was the first high-profile case. The FBI paid a large sum to Cellbrite to bypass Apple's security, but it's unclear if they found anything useful. This incident sparked a debate about whether there should be a backdoor into Apple's security, especially in light of concerns about government surveillance.