First M4 Max benchmark tears apart the M2 Ultra Mac Studio
by Malcolm Owen · AppleInsiderThe M4 Max is the most powerful chip in Apple's collection, with an early benchmark showing the MacBook Pro leaving the Mac Studio or Mac Pro with M2 Ultra in its dust.
Late on Thursday, supposed benchmarks for the M4 Pro surfaced on Geekbench, seemingly showing that the M4 Pro is an extremely powerful chip. On Friday, benchmarks for the M4 Max have practically cemented the M4 range's status as the most powerful chips Apple's ever made.
The benchmark for the Mac16,5, a 16-inch MacBook Pro, appeared in the Geekbench results browser early on Friday morning. The listing states it uses an M4 Max chip with 16 cores, divided into 12 performance cores and four efficiency cores, and a clock speed of 1.5GHz.
The main figures for the listing say the Mac scored 4,060 for Geekbench's single-core test, and 26,675 for the multi-core version.
By comparison, the early M4 Pro results scored the single-core test at 3,925 and the multi-core at 22,669.
Both of these results are much higher than the 2023 Mac Studio with the M2 Ultra. That model is listed with 2,777 for the single-core test and 21,351 for the multi-core, even though the model tested had 24 CPU cores.
As early benchmarks for models that have yet to be released to the public, the figures should be considered with trepidation. It is entirely possible that the numbers are faked or wrong.
That said, they do seem to be fairly realistic and in line with the performance claims Apple has made in its announcements.
As reviewers and other early users get to try out the new Mac models, the multitude of benchmarks will offer a true view of performance improvements.
It does, however, tease at what an M4 Ultra chip could be like. Effectively two M4 Max chips with an interconnect and therefore double the cores, the score should also be about twice as high as the M4 Max.
5 Comments
gwmac 1799 comments · 17 Years
About 2 hours ago
If this is true I may reconsider waiting for the Studio next summer and just get a maxed out Mini instead. I have a feeling a lot of 5K iMac owners like me are coming to the realization that a larger 32 inch M4 iMac is just not in the cards.
Galfan 8 comments · 2 Years
About 2 hours ago
My god…..I was thinking when I purchased my M1 Max 16 inch I would be fine for 4-5 years but this might consider me upgrading this year….also because I noticed the GPU is hitting the limit sometimes but also that with my new function I need more headroom for bigger projects with the CPU. I do wonder how the thermals will be. M3 max is a powerhouse but pushed even the 16 inch starts to become loud. But since a18 pro and M4 have proven they run cooler and energy efficient, I will wait for the reviews coming out
tht 5573 comments · 23 Years
About 1 hour ago
Cool to see 4000 single GB6 scores.
foregoneconclusion 2822 comments · 12 Years
About 1 hour ago
Memory bandwidth:
M4 Max = 546 GB/s
M4 Pro = 273 GB/s
M2 Ultra = 800 GB/s
Sail_No_55 2 comments · 3 Years
About 51 minutes ago
Nearing time to replace my work 10 Core Xeon iMac Pro I guess, I had to ditch my really old home iMac (graphics died) for an M2-Pro 16GB Mini last year, and I'm impressed with how speedy it is for basic applications. I'll probably wait for the Studio in the summer too... I had already asked my IT guy to include me in the budget when the our windows machine upgrades happen next year. Hopefully we can get some M4 Pro/Max comparisons with the iMac Pro not just the i3 iMac and also with Parallels since in my case I need the power for a graphics intensive Windows app.
Share Your Thoughts on our Forums ->