Flat buyers cheated : Court orders fresh probe against Gambhir in cheating case

Highlights

Gambhir is the only accused who had a direct interface with the investors in his capacity as a brand ambassador

New Delhi: Directing a fresh investigation, a Delhi court has set aside the discharge of former cricketer and current head coach of the Indian cricket team Gautam Gambhir, and others in a case where flat buyers were reportedly cheated.

Special Judge Vishal Gogne set aside a magisterial court order, saying it reflected “inadequate expression of mind” in deciding the allegations against Gambhir. “The allegations also merit further investigation into the role of Gautam Gambhir,” Judge Gogne wrote in his October 29 order. An alleged was filed against real estate firms Rudra Buildwell Realty Pvt. Ltd, H R Infracity Pvt Ltd., U M Architectures and Contractors Ltd., and Gambhir, who was a director and brand ambassador of the companies’ joint venture.

The judge noted Gambhir was the only accused who had a “direct interface with the investors” in his capacity as a brand ambassador and though he had been discharged, the magisterial court’s order made no reference to him paying Rs 6 crore to Rudra Buildwell Realty Pvt. Ltd and receiving Rs 4.85 crore from the company.

“The chargesheet did not clarify whether the amounts paid back to him by Rudra had any nexus or were sourced from the funds received from the investors in the project in question. Since the core of the allegations pertains to the offence of cheating, it was required to be clarified by the chargesheet and also by the impugned order whether any component of the cheated amount(s) came to the hand of Gambhir,” the judge said.

The court observed Gambhir had had financial transactions with the company beyond his role as a brand ambassador and was an additional director between June 29, 2011 and October 1, 2013, adding “Thus, he was an office bearer when the project was advertised.” The court underlined the “bulk of the repayment to him” occurred after he had resigned from the position of additional director on October 1, 2013.

“Yet, the impugned order generalised the findings against Gambhir by combining the findings against him with observations of the court regarding other accused (not named in the complaint). The impugned order reflects inadequate expression of mind in deciding the allegations against Gambhir. The allegations also merit further investigation into the role of Gambhir,” said the order.

The court, therefore, remanded the case back to the magisterial court directing it “to pass a detailed fresh order on the charge specifying the allegations against each accused” in relation to the offences and the corresponding evidence in the chargesheet. The accused had reportedly jointly promoted and advertised an upcoming housing project at Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh called “Serra Bella” in 2011 which was renamed in 2013 as “Pavo Real”.